Gary’s Blog

Old Forester – Taste Through History

/ / Bourbon, Gary's Blog

Old Forester – Taste Through History
with Master Taster Jackie Zykan

Thursday, May 30th 2019 – $15 per person
Tower Tasting Room
5877 Buford Highway, Suite A
Doraville, GA 30340
We would like to thank Brown-Forman and Weber Shandwick for the complimentary invitation to the event!

Event Description
Please join us for a tasting of Old Forester and a chance to meet Master Taster Jackie Zykan.
We will be sampling:
1910 Old Fine Whiskey
1870 Original Batch
1897 Bottled in Bond
1920 Prohibition Style

Event Review

The Tower Tasting Room sits off the side of Tower Beer, Wine & Spirits in Doraville, GA, with an independent entrance from the retail store. They host various events such as this, and if you’re local to Atlanta, I’d recommend checking in from time to time. I’ve attended a couple of tasting events here and at their other location, and they have a really nice setup.

Each participant was welcomed with bottled water,  7 samples placed over an image of the originating bottle, and some brief tasting notes – seen below.  I’d estimate that the samples were 1/3 to 1/2 ounce each, and all were covered with paper prior to the event kicking off.
Old Forester Taste Through History
We also received an Old Forester pen, a small Moleskine, and cards for each of the products on the placemat (along with one for Old Forester The Statesmen). Appreciated the cards since those were easier to take with than the placemat.  Also thankful for the Moleskine, as while I had thought to bring my own pen – I forgot a notebook!
Old Forester Taste Through History Swag
A representative from Old Forester/Brown-Forman did a nice introduction to Jackie Zykan, the Master Taster at Old Forester – including ‘What does a Master Taster do?’ which is a question I had coming into the event. I’ve met many Master Distillers over the years, including Chris Morris (Master Distiller for Brown-Forman, which makes Old Forester along with Woodford Reserve, Early Times, and Jack Daniels), but wasn’t familiar with this role. Easiest explanation offered was ‘Chris Morris oversees what goes into the barrel, Jackie oversees what comes out’. She’s involved in barrel selection for their Whiskey Row series, leading their private barrel program, and also leads the Birthday Bourbon proofing tasting (where they taste what will be bottled as Birthday Bourbon at every proof starting at 86 on up to identify the best proof point for that batch).  Jackie’s background includes an education in chemistry and biology, and she started bar-tending before working her way up to a beverage director role, and ultimately where she is now.

She introduced each product, explaining first the historical context and significance of the year, and what they were aiming to represent with each.  We’ve done reviews on almost all (working on getting the last one later this month!) so will skip the tasting details but share some of the notes from the history lesson.

1870 Original Batch

– Brown-Forman created Old Forester as a non-distilling producer, batching barrels from three different distilleries to create a consistent profile (they bought the Mattingly distillery in 1901-1902 and begin distilling for themselves).
– This offering is the smallest batch of Old Forester produced (excluding ‘single barrel’ obviously), with only 21 barrels – 7 barrels selected from 3 different warehouses (all distilled by OF, but to get different flavor profiles).
– The average age of barrels batched for this are 4 1/2 to 5 yrs.

1897 Bottled In Bond

– 1897 is when the U.S. Bottled-in-Bond Act was passed, which George Garvin Brown wasn’t a fan of. The intent was to ensure quality – which they had been doing for the last 27 years already. But now they couldn’t bottle the same product with this new ‘quality ensured label’ (to be labeled Bottled-in-Bond, the whiskey must all be produced from the same distillery during the same distilling season, etc).
– This batch (and all other Whiskey Row series products, other than 1870 Original Batch) is comprised of 100 barrels or less.

1910 Old Fine Whisky

– In 1910 there was a fire (not their offices, but a neighbor) which caused their bottling line to be shut down. Waiting to be bottled was a vat of mature whisky already brought down to 100 proof to be bottled. They couldn’t let it sit indefinitely, so they had to put it back into new, charred oak barrels until the bottling line was repaired.
– As the flavor profile of this was different from the Old Forester which was bottled-in-bond, they didn’t label this whisky as Old Forester and instead labeled it as Very Fine Old Whisky to avoid confusion.
– This is the only Old Forester expression that is double-barreled.
– Standard Old Forester barrels are charred for 22 seconds; the second barrels used here are charred for 60 seconds!
– Barrels are dumped at 4.5 to 5 yrs, and cut to 100 proof before going into the second barrel.
– Bottled at 93 proof because frankly – it tasted best at that proof.

1920 Prohibition Style

– During Prohibition, the only whisky made was for medicinal purposes, and was bottled at 100 proof. But with the 1897 Bottled in Bond, wanted to showcase to consumers how it would have tasted straight from the barrel. Back in 1920, their archives show that the proof coming out of the barrels was 115 (note that it was only 100 proof going INTO the barrels back then; today it is 125 proof).
– Side note:  I asked Jackie if they have experimented with going into the barrel at a lower proof and might offer such an expression in the future. Understandably she couldn’t talk about future products but did share that they experiment with a lot of different things – and she would love to see them have an offering that goes in at a lower proof, as this would create a sweeter bourbon based on chemistry and stuff (my interpretation; I couldn’t write fast enough to capture the actual chemistry explanation!)  While likely delicious, it would be a more expensive bourbon as you’re getting fewer proof-gallons as a result (and the barrel is the most expensive component). Crossing my fingers that we’ll see some limited bottling of Old Forester in the future (maybe ‘100 Proof In & Out?’)

Rye

– While Old Forester never made a rye until their new product, they have bought other brands and recipes, and in 1940 owned the recipe for Normandy Rye (hence why it follows the 1920 on the timeline). The mashbill of 65% rye, 20% malted barley and 15% corn is unique, and Jackie explained that they tested 30 different recipes before settling on this one. A big factor was wanting to avoid the need for added enzymes, as rye can create a foamy mess while fermenting. The higher barley content allows them to avoid the added enzymes, and also adds some unique flavors.

86 Proof

– During the 1950s, there was an explosion of ‘blended whisky’, which can include straight bourbon blended with ‘grain neutral spirits’ to make a lighter spirit in both color and flavor. The 86 proof Old Forester was introduced to meet this market demand. Barrels for this are pulled on their 4th birthday – as young as they can bottle without including an age statement.

100 Proof

– Formerly called Old Forester Signature, this product was introduced during the early 1990s, thanks to the 1980s. Bourbon buffs are familiar with that period, where bourbon wasn’t selling as well and stocks were piling up. Because you can’t sell as ‘bottled-in-bond’ if you have barrels from different distilling seasons, these barrels that were older couldn’t be used in that product so they created Old Forester Signature – bottled at 100 proof but including barrels of various ages.
– Jackie shared that when they are selecting barrels for Birthday Bourbon each year (which are typically 9 to 13 yrs old), the barrels that don’t quite make the cut for that wind up in Old Forester Signature.

While not on the tasting mat, after the conclusion of the Taste Through History they offered a sample of Old Forester Statesman, a bourbon created for the movie  The Kingsman: The Golden Circle.  I enjoyed it, but after 7 prior samples couldn’t capture detailed enough notes (although received a sample later, which is reviewed here!)

Beyond the history lesson and some insights into each product, I also learned:

1. All Old Forester whisky is non-chill filtered.

2. While Old Forester and Woodford Reserve both use the same mashbill of 72% corn, 18% rye, and 10% malted barley, the barrels used are seasoned differently for Woodford Reserve.

3. The story behind the odd-bottle used in Birthday Bourbon? When they first had the idea of the expression, to release it around George Garvin Brown’s birthday in early September, they were limited to what they could get on about 3 months notice. They didn’t want to use the same bottles used in Old Forester to ensure this differentiated itself. Process of elimination left they with really one choice – what it has been bottled in since.

I thoroughly enjoyed myself, and learned a fair amount too (including where to eat when I finally get to Lynchburg, TN to visit Jack Daniels – Jackie recommended Miss Mary Bobo’s Boarding House as a can’t miss!)  Hope if you have the chance to attend a similar event, you’re able to carve out some time (and get a ticket, as these apparently sell out quickly!)

Old Forester – Taste Through History Read More »

Any given whisk(e)y on any given Sunday

/ / Gary's Blog

I’m sure most have heard the phrase “On any given Sunday“, which is a short version of “On any given Sunday, any team can beat any other team“.  In my experience, the same can be said about whisk(e)y . . . to some extent. “Any” is probably too generous (I can’t imagine the day when I would find Buffalo Trace more to my liking than George T Stagg), but there are absolutely days when I like a particular whisk(e)y more or less.

We’ve talked about the variables that impact whisk(e)y, but the dram is only a part of the equation – lest we forget about the drinker and the environment. When it comes to the drinker – there are a lot of things that could impact what WE sense, including time of day, what we’ve had to eat prior, how hydrated we are, if we’re suffering from seasonal allergies, if we’ve got (or are just overcoming) a head-cold, or any number of other things.  It’s easy to know when you’ve got a cold, but there are days I feel perfectly fine, have poured a dram that I’m fairly familiar with, and it doesn’t taste right to me.  Maybe I get the herbal notes but I’m missing most of the sweetness (I personally find this happens after a head-cold – sometimes for a week or more).  Or I get a bit of everything I expect to, but it feels like the volume was turned down.  Sometimes I get almost nothing but alcohol – which is when I pour it back in the bottle and tap out for the day.

Let me share a quick story.  I’m with a gathering of whisk(e)y friends, where we’ve got 30+ bottles on the table and everyone is welcome to sample whatever you want. There’s been food, drink, and some cigar smoking on the back porch, as well as plenty of laughs. Someone brings out a decanter that is damned impressive looking, and passes it around – but isn’t saying what it is. I think to myself that it might be one of the best pours I’ve had all night. It strikes me as well balanced, sweet with fruit, oak, and spice notes, and a finish that doesn’t quit. After much debate about what this marvelous dram was, he discloses it was ‘just Macallan 12 yr’ in a decanter that cost more than the bottle of whisk(e)y.

My point is this: our enjoyment of the water of life is about more than the liquid itself.  While the spirit is important, take time to appreciate the setting, and savor those moments spent with friends and family over a glass of the water of life.  When I think of my most fond whisk(e)y memories, the first thing I recall is who I was with – not necessarily what we were drinking.

Cheers!
Gary

Any given whisk(e)y on any given Sunday Read More »

“I love bourbon, but can’t get into Scotch? Why?”

/ / Gary's Blog

First, while both bourbon and scotch are “whisk(e)y”, they’re very different products. Expecting to enjoy one just because you enjoy the other would be like expecting to enjoy grapefruit juice because you enjoy apple juice (I mean, they are both fruit juices, right?)  Sure – there are loads of folks who happen to enjoy both (including me!) but a fondness for one isn’t a strong predictor necessarily of how one feels about the other.  I know plenty of folks who love one group intensely, and scratch their heads over what the fuss is all about over the other.

I believe this question may come from a misplaced expectation that they’ll be somewhat similar. If you love bourbon and are hoping to find what you love about bourbon in a scotch – you’re probably setting yourself up to be disappointed. The opposite is just as true; someone who loves a delicate, fruity, smokey single malt and is looking for that same profile in a bourbon is likely to have their expectations fall short.

Let’s cover some of the major differences between these two broad categories of whisk(e)y:

1. GRAINS
  • Bourbon includes by law a minimum of 51% corn in its mashbill.  Typically it is higher than that – 60-70% corn – with the remainder consisting of other grains (such as wheat or rye, and barley). Each of these grains have different purposes, characteristics and impart different flavors. Compare products that are a majority of one grain (like Mellow Corn BIB, Bernheim Wheat or Rittenhouse Rye) with Evan Williams and you get the idea. The proportion of these grains in the mashbill provide unique character to different bourbons (along with a bunch of other factors).
  • Scotch (single malt at least) is made with barley – period. No other grains involved. Blended scotch or single grain scotch whisky may use other grains, so let’s set those aside for now.  While barley is often a grain in many bourbon mashbills, it is typically the smallest grain component (like 12% or less).
2. WOOD
  • Bourbon must be aged in new, charred oak containers (almost always a barrel, but the regs state “container”). This is a critical point, as the charring of that new oak leads to the caramelization of the natural sugars in the wood. As the spirit moves in and out of the wood during the aging period, it is picking up flavors from that caramelization, such as vanilla and caramel. It also gets its dark color from moving in/out of the charred oak.  This is why a 4 yr old bourbon will almost always have more color than any 4 yr old scotch (assuming no artificial color is added – which is allowed in scotch but NOT in bourbon).
  • Scotch is rarely aged in new oak and is typically aged in used barrels. This makes a huge difference in terms of how quickly the spirit takes on color and flavor, as well as what flavors. Yet another facet is how those barrels were previously used. Because bourbon requires the use of a new barrel, there are a LOT of barrels which previously held bourbon on the market, and a lot of them wind up holding scotch. But scotch can also be aged in barrels which once held sherry, port, and other products. These products each impart different flavors and characters on the spirit. For example, sherry casks give a lot of deep color and dark fruit flavors (and whether it is the first fill of a sherry cask vs a second or even third fill will have an impact).  While these used barrels are charred again to ensure there aren’t ugly baddies taking up shop in the wood, this won’t have the same affect as when the wood is new (the sugars were already caramelized the first go round, and have given up some portion of what they have to offer).  Oh – and a “single malt scotch” may consists of whisky aged in different containers blended together in the final product.
3. CLIMATE
  • Bourbon has to be made in the United States by law, and the overwhelming majority of it is produced in Kentucky – which sits between 36th and 39th parallel (the entire continental US runs from the 25th to the 49th parallel). Bardstown, the “bourbon capital of the world” (just ask anyone from Bardstown; they’ll confirm this is THEIR title), sees average high temps ranging from 43°F in January to 87°F in July, with a typical swing of 20-25 degrees between the average lows and highs each month. What that has to do with bourbon is how much that spirit goes into and out of the wood. Keep in mind that within those rickhouses, the summer temps get considerably hotter in the summer (and vary based on location within the rickhouse), and maintain more steady temps in the winter – but let’s set that aside for the sake of a more direct comparison to scotch. Besides going in/out of the wood, the temps (along with some other factors like humidity, etc) tend to drive the proof of the whiskey up in casks aged higher in the rickhouses.
  • Scotch has to be made in Scotland by law, and the mainland all sits between the 55th and 59th parallel – only a slightly larger zone than Kentucky (but much further north!) Just for the sake of comparison, let’s look at Glasgow’s climate. Their average low temp is also 43°F in January, but in July their average high is only 66°F – about half the jump that Bardstown sees! As important as that, they see a typical swing of only 7-12 degrees between their average low and high temps. This all means that the spirit is interacting with the wood a lot more slowly. Besides taking longer for the cask to impart flavors, it provides for more of an impact from oxidation and good ol’ time. Coupled with humidity and other factors, the proof tends to go down in the whisky as it ages – which is one reason you don’t see a lot of “high proof” scotch compared to bourbon.

Now there are absolutely other differences between these two (notice how I’m avoiding peat entirely?)  In fact, if you’re curious about what other variables impact a whiskey, Richard did a great job of listing many more here.  When you start combining just the three mentioned above – hopefully it is clear why these whiskies are so different. In my opinion, those differences aren’t a disappointment in any way/shape/form.  They’re wonderful and should be celebrated!

At the end of the day – it is perfectly OK to not like one or the other (or either, although I’m not sure why you’re reading this if that’s the case). It shouldn’t be a chore to “like” something for crying out loud (in-laws and co-workers excluded). But I hope you’ll continue to try new things because that’s the only way to learn what you will or won’t like. Keep an open mind going in, and most importantly – have fun. A wise old man once told me “If you’re having fun, you’re doing it right”. I’m not sure exactly how wise he is, but on that note I think he got it exactly right.

Cheers!
Gary

“I love bourbon, but can’t get into Scotch? Why?” Read More »

Trying Before Buying . . . (a whole bottle)

/ / Gary's Blog

I’ve shared some thoughts on how to guestimate if you might like something that you’ve never tried before, and admitted there that the only foolproof method IS to try it.  But – trying doesn’t means you have to run out and buy an entire bottle.

If you’re just starting out on your whiskey journey, the good news is that you can find a lot of brands offered in “mini” bottles (50 mL; the size you get on an airplane).  Some stores have a pretty wide selection, others not so much.  Now you’re paying a premium when buying a smaller size, but I’d much rather spend $4 on a 50 mL of something and discover I don’t like it than spend $25 on a 750 mL of the same with the same results.  The availability varies based on location, so I’ll focus here on bourbon to illustrate.

Between Georgia and Kentucky (the two states where I’ve made the majority of my whiskey purchases), I’ve seen the following offered in 50 mL mini bottles – typically for $4 or less:

Jim Beam white label, Woodford Reserve, Wild Turkey 101, Evan Williams black label, Maker’s Mark, Jack Daniel’s (spare me the ‘not a bourbon’ emails please), Buffalo Trace, Larceny, Old Forester, and Bulleit bourbon.

Some larger retailers (especially in Kentucky) carry a selection of some higher-end labels in 50 mL minis, which may run $5-$10, but again – same logic applies.  Examples I’ve seen include:

Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel, Baker’s, Booker’s, Four Roses Single Barrel, Knob Creek, Wild Turkey Rare Breed, and Blanton’s.

Most premium whiskies (which for this definition I’ll say are $90 or more for a 700/750 mL bottle) unfortunately aren’t offered in “mini” bottles.  Hell, most aren’t offered in any size other than the standard bottle (700/750 mL), although sometimes you’re pleasantly surprised.  Switching styles to scotch – there is a Johnnie Walker sampler pack with 4 200 mL bottles, including Johnnie Walker Blue Label (locally, this runs about $100).  I looked for that as I wanted to try Johnnie Walker Blue, but didn’t want to spend on a full price bottle (and while paying a premium, the chance to have several visits across their lineup was a lot of fun, and well worth it).

Now you can also try something at a bar or restaurant (also known as “on-premise”) before buying a whole bottle, but have you done the math for what that premium cost?  It isn’t an exact science (and there are different strategies involved, wholesale pricing, etc) – and this isn’t a complaint about on-premise mark-up either (they’ve got labor costs involved, insurance, etc).  But typically the product component is running 20-30% of the price you pay.  For example – one local bar pours 2 oz of Buffalo Trace for $10 (so $5/oz).  A full bottle (25 oz+) runs around $25 – so the retail cost is about $1/oz.  Now sometimes as the product cost increases, the mark-up decreases since the labor costs are really the same (again, NOT in the on-premise business; understand there are all sorts of strategies, market demand, etc).  I’ve seen Johnnie Walker Blue poured for $50 (and $75).  That’s a lot of coin, but again – if I hadn’t ever tried it, even $75 is a lot less than $200-$250 for a bottle (especially if I’m underwhelmed).  So that’s another option to try something before you buy – although personally I reserve that for the more premium offerings.

While most high-end labels aren’t available in the smaller sizes, I recently came across an exception:  Peerless Rye 24 month.  Now while I enjoyed the whiskey, the price (offered around $125, then discounted to $99, and now in some areas down to $69) I think is absurd.  Yes, it is an interesting whiskey to try if you’re a whiskey geek, but an expensive proposition.  So I was floored when browsing a local retailer and I saw they were offering 200 mL bottles of Peerless Rye 24 month for $28.  If I hadn’t tried that before, I absolutely would have bought one just to satisfy my curiosity.

“Wait . . . $28 for a 200 mL?  Seriously?”

Absolutely.  Hear me out – the premium you pay for a 200 mL size is typically 35% to 75%.  For example – Maker’s Mark goes for $10 for a 200 mL while a 750 mL is $22.50; a 67% premium when you calculate the price per mL.  The Peerless Rye 24 month has been going for $100 for a 750 mL.  At the 200 mL pricing, there is barely any premium (5%).  Even when they drop the price to $70; the premium you’re paying is 50%, which isn’t out of the norm.

Now I haven’t gone searching for Peerless Rye at local bars, but if I found it there, and their pricing is based on the new reduced rate of $70, depending upon how they set their price (which is a whole other thing; I get it) I can reasonably expect to pay $20-$25 for a 2 oz pour.  If I’m going to spend $20-$25 for 2 oz (just shut of 60 mL), why wouldn’t I spend $28 and get more than three times that amount?  Not only is it a better price, but with 200 mL I can revisit it multiple times, and better control my tasting environment.  Hell, I could test it in several cocktails, neat, etc.

The Peerless Rye example is an exception to be sure, but a great example of where buying small can save you some money – especially when you’re trying to figure out what you like or don’t like.  I made the mistake when starting out of buying a lot of bottles, only to discover I wasn’t crazy about some – and was stuck with 90% of a bottle.  Yeah, you can mix it in cocktails or cook with it – but life’s too short to have to find ways to get rid of whiskey you just don’t enjoy.

Some other alternatives to consider based on your situation:

    1. Find a whiskey society/club in your area!  These vary greatly in terms of how they work, what they do and don’t do.  I’ve attended function for one where you pay a reasonable fee for some snacks (sometimes a meal) and a tasting of 4-6 various pours (typically a 1/3 oz, but again – this can vary).  I belong to one where it is quite informal, and fellow enthusiasts gather together and share what they care to.  The generosity of this type of group can be (and still is to this day) humbling, and some of the most fun you can have legally and dressed.
    2. Split a bottle with friends!  Maybe you don’t have a club or society, but if you’ve got a couple of friends who are just as keenly interested as you are, but everyone is gun shy about buying a whole bottle “just to find out” – figure out some arrangement to split the cost.  Hell – a $120 bottle split three ways is only $40 for 8 oz (which is likely what you’d pay for a shot in a bar – so splurge and have the opportunity to try it in various settings, neat or on the rocks, in a cocktail, etc.)
    3. Amazon wish-list.  Ok – I’ll admit I’ve done this before when there was something I was interested in, but too cheap to spring for.  Granted – most of my family would rather not buy me another bottle of whiskey for a birthday or Christmas present, so I’d put this at the bottom of my list – but it has worked (although keep in mind pricing expectations and effort; don’t put something down that isn’t fairly easily attainable, and is in whatever price range you’d spend on them!)

Cheers!
Gary

Trying Before Buying . . . (a whole bottle) Read More »

On This Date 10 Years Ago . . .

/ / Gary's Blog, Matt's Blog, Richard's Blog

On Saturday, January 24th 2009, Whisk(e)y Apostle began with our first post. Ten years ago. Wow.

Time can be a funny thing. On the one hand, ten years seems like a LONG time ago (the days before everyone had ‘smartphones’ as we know them today; Android’s first phone had only been out a few months, and if you wanted an iPhone – you had better be on AT&T). On the other hand, not so much (Jack Daniel’s was $19.99 for a 750 mL – same as today). A lot has changed in those ten years. I have a hard enough time remembering what I had for lunch 3 days ago, let alone what I was doing ten years ago. A scan of the headlines quickly brought me back.

Within the couple weeks surrounding our launch, some of the news of the day (here in the US at least) included:

  • The “Miracle on the Hudson” (US Airways Flight 1549), which happened 9 days earlier.
  • Barack Obama’s first inauguration as President of the United States, which was the Tuesday prior to our first post.
  • The United States was still in the throes of the Great Recession of 2008. The $787 billion stimulus package hadn’t yet been passed, and the Dow hadn’t yet his it’s recession low (which would happen in March 2009).
  • Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich was in the midst of his impeachment trial.

While not ‘front page headlines’ in the mainstream media, some big news was taking place in American whiskey. That same month, Constellation Brands sold Barton (along with 40 other brands) to Sazerac, effectively exiting the American whiskey market (well, at least until 2016 when they purchased High West, and shortly after a minority stake in Bardstown Bourbon Co). In April 2009, Pernod Ricard sold Wild Turkey to Gruppo Campari (and just a couple years later, would invest in doubling their production capacity).

The ‘bourbon boom’ as we know it today hadn’t really gotten into gear. And I’d venture a guess that many of our readers weren’t yet “really into whiskey” yet (by my own admission – I wasn’t!)

We’ve shared how we each ‘found whiskey’ before, but that’s just the beginning of the journey.  After more than 650 collective whisk(e)y reviews, and hundreds of other posts, I thought it would be fun to check in with each of the apostles on their thoughts of what Whisk(e)y Apostle and the last ten years have meant to them.

Matt

Ten years seems like an eternity ago and yet seems too short a time. The way I remember it, Richard and I started planning for the site sitting on a picnic table in Bloomington, IL while I was in graduate school, so the idea is closer to 15 or 16 years old. We had to go to a local park to find a cigar friendly environment. So we smoked, drank whisky, and philosophized as we laid the ground work for what eventually became Whisk(e)y Apostle. We even coined the term Whisk(e)y Apostle and came up with our slogan at that cracked and faded table along the edge of the Constitution Trail. It would be several years before we circled back to the idea. If I could offer advice to anyone, it would be to not try to launch a time-consuming enterprise while in graduate school or while planning a wedding, and definitely not while doing both. I’d be lying if I said the site became everything we envisioned on that picnic table way back when, but I can’t say I’m disappointed.

Ten years is no small feat and, thanks to Gary, it’s got legs beyond Richard and I. I’m grateful to Richard for taking the reins when I had to step away due to some personal difficulties. I always intended to come back (in more than the ghostly role I play these days), but there was a I time when I spent 6-10 hours a week reading blogs, whiskey enthusiast publications, and press briefings, and another 4-8 hours tasting, writing, and attending events. I just don’t have that kind of time these days. If I’m honest, I don’t have the interest either. When we started this, Richard and I had a Pokemon approach (gotta try ‘em all). I’ve found what I like and I’m comfortable in that. I’ll try pretty much anything, but I don’t have that desire to try everything anymore. I’ll still talk/argue/pontificate about whisk(e)y with anyone who cares to listen, but I don’t search it out (the Georgia Bourbon Society and our yearly trips to Bardstown, KY pretty much fill my needs there). If you’re a long-time reader (thanks to both of you), you’ll be happy to know I still hate marketing double-speak, liars (but I like a good story), and most Canadian Whisky. I’ve softened my stance on cocktails, peat, and ice in whisky. I still love the ritual of whiskey and sharing it with friends, both old and new. Thanks for the ride.

Richard

10 years come and gone. I wasn’t a father ten years ago. I had just brought home the puppy I would name Aberlour and now she sits looking at me write with a gray face and the calm tolerance of a senior dog. Youth, family members gone, energy….it’s easy to measure time in things lost. But as I look back on those ten years and what Whisk(e)y Apostle* meant to me I keep thinking about what I gained.

As Gary pointed out, I gained many great friendships with other whiskey enthusiasts from around the world. I’ve gone from sharing drams at the Quaich Bar in Scotland to drinking freshly thieved snorts of bourbon straight from the barrel offered to me by names like Jim Rutledge and Eddie Russell. This site has brought me people, opportunities, and experiences that I never would have imagined when Matt and I were sitting on that damn splinter ridden picnic table so many years ago. I drink better now, no doubt. I smoke much better too (I can’t believe we ever smoked those infused cigars). In general, I think my life is much richer and more fulfilling in many ways because of the water of life and the site we dedicated to it.

I’ve definitely found my groove when it comes to whiskey. I know my sandbox and where I like to play. That doesn’t mean that it still doesn’t excite me. All you need to do is happen upon me talking to some poor soul who only wanted to ask a couple of questions and you will see by the dissertation I’m delivering that I am actively still “proselytizing the way of malt.” But life changes and we change. With a career, two daughters, and many commitments it became increasingly difficult to give Whisk(e)y Apostle the time it deserved. I can’t fully express my gratitude to Matt for convincing me to start this journey and to Gary for keeping the dream alive. The site has brought so many wonderful experiences and people into my life. I couldn’t imagine the last ten years without it.

And the drams were pretty damn good too!

* We never really addressed this here but the damn parentheses were Matt’s idea. In the early days we were sending all our thoughts back and forth for post, etc. He kept telling me to use the parentheses because that’s “part of our brand”. It seemed a little silly then and it does now too but ten years in there is no going back.

Gary

As the whole of my whiskey journey has really been in the last 10 years, I think what stands out to me are how many friends I’ve made thanks to the water of life.  I’ve mentioned before how much this blog meant to my personal whiskey journey, which I know can sound like some made-up cornball story despite being 100% true.  In June of 2012, I emailed Richard to ask about this ‘Georgia Bourbon Society’ he had mentioned in a post the year prior (having recently started attending Metro Atlanta Scotch Club gatherings, and looking to expand my horizons).  The next month I attended my first official meeting of the ‘Georgia Bourbon Society’ (GBS), and after enduring a hazing involving a goat and some truly nasty dusty bourbon, I was welcomed into the group (or at least not immediately told to leave and forget the address).  I can link back dozens of friendships back to that single point, with folks from around the world.  I can’t count how many amazing evenings I’ve shared with them, trying new (and old) whiskies, learning more about the spirit we all share a love of, and being reminded that at the end of the day – a good fart joke is just as funny in your 30s and 40s as it was when you were 7.

Beyond the friendships and camaraderie I’ve enjoyed through whiskey, some other highlights for me also revolve around this blog.  I was super excited in late summer 2014 when Richard asked if I was interested in taking a stab at doing some whiskey reviews.  And I was honored when last year he asked if I’d be interested in taking on the managing editor responsibilities here at Whisk(e)y Apostle.  I learned it’s more work than I originally thought, but is absolutely a labor of love.

Thanks for still reading (if you’ve got this far), and indulging us in our short trip down memory lane.  Looking forward to continuing to bring you whiskey reviews, ponderings, and other nonsense!

Cheers!
Gary (and Matt & Richard)

On This Date 10 Years Ago . . . Read More »